IAST shifts testing left in the SDLC. IAST generally takes place during the test/QA stage of the software development life cycle (SDLC). IAST effectively shifts testing left, so problems are caught earlier in the development cycle, reducing remediation costs and delays. Many tools can be integrated into continuous integration (CI) and continuous development (CD) tools. The latest-generation tools return results as soon as changed code is recompiled and the running app retested, helping developers identify vulnerabilities even earlier in the development process.
IAST provides accurate results for fast triage. To keep pace with the demand for rapid development of web applications, organizations need accurate, automated security testing tools that scale to process hundreds of thousands of HTTP requests while returning results with low false-positive rates. DAST tools often generate many false positives but don’t specify lines of code for identified vulnerabilities, making it difficult to triage results and easily eliminate false positives. Both IAST and SAST can provide detailed information (including lines of code) to help development and security teams triage test results.
IAST pinpoints the source of vulnerabilities. IAST does analysis from within applications and has access to application code, runtime control and dataflow information, memory and stack trace information, HTTP requests and responses, and libraries, frameworks, and other components (via an SCA tool). This analysis allows developers to pinpoint the source of an identified vulnerability and fix it quickly.
IAST integrates easily into CI/CD. Web application development teams and DevOps teams require AppSec tools that integrate seamlessly with standard build, test, and QA tools without extensive configuration or tuning to reduce false positives. These tools should be easy to deploy, update, and scale to support large enterprise requirements. IAST is the only type of dynamic testing technique that integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines.
IAST allows for earlier, less costly fixes. Security and development teams need AppSec tools that find vulnerabilities and enable developers to fix them early in the SDLC, when developers are most familiar with their code and errors and vulnerabilities are least costly to fix from a resources and security risk posture perspective. SAST and SCA tools are typically used during the development stage, while IAST is used during the test/QA stage. Results are fed back to developers, who fix identified vulnerabilities during the development stage.
Quick Review Of Application Security Testing
When I attend social functions with friends, people often ask what I do. I'm never quite sure where to start. "I run a small tech company that helps Java applications run more securely" is probably overkill. "I help keep hackers out of proprietary places by seeking out software issues and security flaws with specialized tools" has worked.
But usually, I just default to asking them questions. "How much do you know about software development tools and what developers do?" or "What field do you work in?" or "Do you know much about writing code?" usually lets me know how much depth I should go into with them.
Because you've stumbled upon our blog, I'm assuming that you know something about computer programming, coding tools, and the development process, and that you want to know how to find vulnerabilities in your software so that it’s more secure to outside and inside threats. So I'm going to talk about dynamic application security testing (DAST) and static application security testing (SAST) for a moment, then explain why interactive application security testing (IAST) is an approach that’s going to produce better results in a faster time frame, helping developers meet their primary objective: creating software solution that are secure.
Let’s take a quick look at SAST vs. DAST vs. IAST in the development/testing process.
DYNAMIC APPLICATION SECURITY TESTING (DAST)
DAST, also known as black box testing, is an approach that tests a running application's exposed interfaces looking for vulnerabilities, and flaws. It's testing from the outside in, which is why dynamic application security testing is also referred to as black box testing. The technology and tools have been part of the development process for a while, and are familiar to most people inside the application security world. DAST is good at finding externally visible issues and vulnerabilities, and it makes it easy to confirm by providing the URL. The downside of DAST is its heavy reliance on experts to write tests, making it difficult to scale.
STATIC APPLICATION SECURITY TESTING (SAST)
Static application security testing tools and technologies analyze the source code or bytecode from the inside out, helping developers find issues and flaws inside their code. If you can prevent vulnerabilities in software before you launch, you'll have stronger code and a more reliable application. Everyone knows that false positives are an issue when testing an application, but SAST can show you exactly where to find issues in the code. Like DAST, SAST requires security experts to properly use SAST tools and solutions.
CONTINUOUS MONITORING VS. SNAPSHOT IN TIME
Because legacy SAST, DAST, and pen testing only provide a snapshot in time, they can’t keep up with today’s agile software development lifecycle processes. Contrast provides a modern approach to application security testing by embedding security expertise in the application itself. This embedded (agent-based), scalable, always on, continuous monitoring solution fits seamlessly across development and production environments, using Contrast sensors that provide real-time vulnerability and attack telemetry throughout application workflows.
IAST (Interactive Application Security Testing)
According to the research firm Gartner, "...next-generation modern web and mobile applications require a combination of static and dynamic application security testing techniques...interactive application security testing approaches have emerged that combine static and dynamic techniques to improve testing." That's the bottom line in application security testing with IAST: When we compare the difference between SAST vs. DAST, IAST gets better results. That's probably why Gartner recommends IAST and IAST tools for providing greater testing accuracy. Just imagine if you could find vulnerabilities while eliminating 99% of all false-positive results in your software development efforts by implementing interactive application security testing. See why Gartner positioned Contrast as A Visionary in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Security Testing.
How does Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) work?
An IAST agent instruments application security solutions, performing all of the analysis in real time from within your application. Interactive security testing could be done in your integration development environment (IDE), in QA, or even while running in production. By doing the analysis from within the application itself, the agent has access to:
- All the code for the application
- Runtime control and data flow information
- Configuration information
- HTTP requests and responses
- Libraries, frameworks, and other components
- Backend connection information
Access to all this information allows IAST tools to cover more code, produce more accurate results, and verify a broader range of security rules than either SAST tools or DAST tools on their own. In addition, IAST agents are easy to install and don't require any application security expertise to use. IAST simply works better.
So the question remains: "Which security tool is best?" or "Which application security testing tool should I use?" or, ultimately, "If I can only afford one security application tool integrated into our SDLC, which one do I choose?"
To learn more about the advantages of IAST, visit our blog about the 7 Advantages of Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), or visit our IAST solution page: Contrast Assess.
You can also schedule a demo from a Contrast Assess expert today!
Most companies build or buy software applications to run their business. Unfortunately, application code exposes critical vulnerabilities to hackers. Contrast solves this complex problem with a bold new secure technology platform that transforms application security by making software self-protecting. Intelligent Contrast agents are injected into the code, instrumenting applications with thousands of smart, agile sensors that detect and correct vulnerabilities before deployment, and protect the software applications in operation. No legacy security tool can protect every application, but a tenacious army of intelligent Contrast sensors can. Because Contrast technology works hand-in-glove with agile and DevOps teams, it transforms every software application in a company’s portfolio from a weak spot into a strong point to decisively repel attacks.
To learn more about Contrast portfolio of products:
All Comments ( 0 )